Loading page...
Loading page...
Loading page...
8 building blocks · blurt the topic, then mark it block by block against the answer key.
Topic preview
Preview the first part of the topic. Unlock FLK2 Playbook to answer prompts, get marked against the answer key, repair gaps, and carry the topic into review.
6 of 8 shown
For a result crime, how do you identify the exact prohibited result and connect it to D’s conduct before considering anything else?
What does it mean to say D’s act was an operating and substantial cause of the result, and why is that the core legal causation question?
When a subsequent event occurs, what indicators help you determine whether it is truly independent of the defendant’s conduct or merely part of the same causal sequence?
How do you analyse medical treatment after D’s act: when is it merely a contributing factor, and when might it be so overwhelming that it breaks causation?
How do you assess a victim’s own actions or reactions without assuming they automatically break the chain?
If a third party intervenes, what do you ask to decide whether that act is a new cause or whether D’s conduct still legally caused the result?
The full topic unlocks with FLK2 Playbook, including the remaining prompts and answer-key marking.
New to the method? See why Paper Tiger beats rereading